Search

Search

Course syllabus Designing and Doing Research, Political Science

Swedish name: Forskningsdesign och analysmetoder, statsvetenskap

Course code:
2SS080
Valid from semester:
Autumn Term 2023
Education cycle:
Second cycle
Scope:
15.0 credits
Progression:
A1N
Grading scale:
Three-grade scale
Main field of study:
Political Science: Security Studies
Department:
Department of Political Science and Law
Subject:
Political Science
Language of instruction:
The teaching is conducted in English.
Decided by:
Forsknings och utbildningsnämndens kursplaneutskott
Decision date:
2022-06-21

Entry requirements

Bachelor's degree of 180 credits, of which 90 credits are in War Studies or an equivalent subject. English skills equivalent to English B or English 6.

Course content and structure

Designing coherent and consistent research is essential for studying political and social phenomena. Good research plays a fundamental role in understanding and explaining war and peace, as well as crisis management, security and defence policies. The course offers the student a broad overview of existing approaches, methods and research tools in war studies and political science. In addition to learning specific analytical methods, the course aims to provide students with the necessary skills to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of various approaches to research, including ethical considerations when conducting research. The course is divided into two parts. The first part is dedicated to various ways in which the student ca produce knowledge and appropriately construct research designs. The second part aims at creating the conditions needed for the student to obtain the necessary skills to analyze and apply various neopositivist and interpretivist methods.

Type of Instruction
Seminars

Lectures

Objectives

After completing the course, the student is expected to be able to:

Knowledge and understanding
  • compare and contrast different research methods,

Competence and skills
  • apply relevant social science concepts related to various research traditions,
  • develop an appropriate research design based on a given research problem,

Judgement and approach
  • independently assess the strengths and weaknesses of different research designs,
  • critically evaluate methodological choices in published research.

Examination formats

Examination
Scope: 15.0

Grading Scale: Fail, Pass, Pass with Distinction

Assessment takes place individually through the submission of individual written assignments and active participation in mandatory seminars.

The examiner may decide to allow supplementation in order to achieve a passing grade. The examiner may decide that absence from mandatory seminars may be compensated by submitting a written supplementary assignment.

Grading
To earn the grade Pass with Distinction in the course, the student must actively participate in the mandatory seminars, and earn Pass with Distinction for all written assignments, with no assignment receiving a grade below Pass.

To earn the grade Pass in the course, the student must actively participate in the mandatory seminars, and earn a grade of Pass or better for all written assignments.

Grading criteria are specified in the course description.

Restrictions in Number of Examinations
There is no limit on the total number of examination opportunities.

Transitional provisions

When the course is no longer given or when the course content has changed substantially, the student has the right to be examined once per semester during a three-term period in accordance with this syllabus.

Other regulations

The course cannot be part of a degree whose content matches the content of this course in whole or in part.

If the Swedish Defence University has formally decided that the student is entitled to receive special educational support due to a disability, the examiner may decide on alternative forms of examination for the student.

On the completion of the course, an evaluation will be conducted under the auspices of the course director, which will form the basis for any changes to the course.

This is an edited version of the syllabus, created to transfer the original to the education database Ladok education planning. For originals, refer to the archive.
Reading list decided date: 2023-09-01
Literature metods
Klemke, E.D., Hollinger, R., & Kline, A.D., (1998), Introductory readings in the philosophy of science, 2nd. ed., New York, Prometheus Books.
Går bra med senare upplaga

Övrig information
Abedi Dunia, Oscar, Maria Eriksson Baaz, Anju Oseema Maria Toppo, Swati Parashar, Mats Utas & James B.M. Vincent (2023). Visibilising Hidden Realities and Uncertainties: The ‘Post-Covid’ Move Towards Decolonized and Ethical Field Research Practices. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 26(5): 549–564.

Aradau, & Hill, A. (2013). The Politics of Drawing: Children, Evidence, and the Darfur Conflict. International Political Sociology, 7(4), 368–387.

Asal, Victor, Justin Conrad & Nathan Toronto (2017). I Want You! The Determinants of Military Conscription. Journal of Conflict Resolution 61(7): 1456-1481.

Axyonova, Vera & Lozka, Katsiaryna (2023). ‘We are at war’: Reflections on positionality and research as negotiation in post-2022 Ukraine. Journal of International Relations and Development. Online first. Article available on Canvas.

Beach, Derek & Pedersen, Rasmus Brun (2019). Process tracing methods: Foundations and guidelines. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press: 1-12. Available on Canvas.

Bennett, Andrew (2010) Case study methods: Design, use and comparative advantages. In Nahmias-Walinsky, Yael (ed.) Models, Numbers and Cases: Methods for Studying International Relations (pp. 19-48). Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press. Available on Canvas.

Bevir, Mark & Rhodes, R.A.W. (2016). Interpretive Political Science: Mapping the field. In Bevir, Mark & R.A.W. Rhodes (eds.) Routledge Handbook of Interpretive Political Science: 3-29. London: Routledge. Available as e-book.

Bochner, Arthur P. and Andrew F. Herrman (2020). Practicing Narrative Inquiry II: Making Meanings Move. In Leavy, Patricia (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research, 285–325. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Booth, Wayne C., Colomb, Gregory G., Williams, Joseph M., Bizup, Joseph and William T. Fitzgerald (2016). The craft of research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 4th ed.: chap. 3-5.

Booth, Wayne C., Colomb, Gregory G., Williams, Joseph M., Bizup, Joseph, Fitzgerald, William T. (2016b) From Questions to a Problem. The Craft of Research (4th Ed) (pp. 49-64). Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Brancati, Dawn (2018). Social scientific research. London: Sage: 199-207. Available on Canvas.

Carson, A. (2016). Facing Off and Saving Face: Covert Intervention and Escalation Management in the Korean War. International Organization 70(1): 103-131.

Fairclough, Norman and Isabela Fairclough (2015). ‘Textual Analysis' in: Bevir, M. & Rhodes, R. A. W. (Eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Interpretive Political Science, pp. 186-198. London: Routledge.

Gentry, Caron E (2016) Chechen political violence as desperation: What feminist discourse analysis reveals. In Wibben, ATR (ed.) Researching war: Feminist methods, ethics and politics (pp. 19-37). London; New York: Routledge

George, Alexander L., and Andrew Bennett (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. Cambridge & London: MIT Press: chap. 9. Available as e-book.

Harding, Sandra (1986). The science question in feminism. Ithaca; London: Cornell University Press: chap. 8 (pp.197-216) & chap. 9 (pp.216-243). Available on Canvas.

Hollis, Martin (1994). The Philosophy of social science: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: chap. 1 & 9. Available as e-book.

Hollis, Simon. (2015). The Role of Regional Organizations in Disaster Risk Management. Palgrave Macmillan, London. Chapter 6.

Holm, Gunilla (2020). Photography as a Research Method. In Leavy, Patricia (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research, 569–594. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jackson, Patrick T. (2011). The Conduct of Inquiry in International Relations: Philosophy of science and its implications for the study of world politics. London: Routledge: chap. 3 (pp.41-72). Available as e-book.

Kellstedt, Paul M., & Guy D. Whitten (2018). The Fundamentals of Political Science Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 3rd edition.

Mbohou, Léger Félix Ntienjom and Sule Tomkinson. Rethinking Elite Interviews Through Moments of Discomfort: The Role of Information and Power. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 21: 1–10.

Powner, Leanne C. (2015). Empirical research and writing: A political science student’s practical guide. London: CQ Press: 168-171. Available on Canvas.

Ricks, Jacob I., and Amy H. Liu (2008). Process-tracing research designs: a practical guide. PS: Political Science & Politics 51(4): 842-846.

Ruffa, Chiara, and Ralph Sundberg (2018). Breaking the frame: Frame disputes of war and peace. Acta sociologica 61(3): 317-332.

Schwartz-Shea, Peregrine & Dvora Yanow (2012). Interpretive Research Design. Concepts and Processes. New York: Routledge. Available as e-book.

Seawright, J., & John Gerring (2008). Case selection techniques in case study research: A menu of qualitative and quantitative options. Political Research Quarterly 61(2): 294-30.

Smith, Linda Tuhiwai (2012). Research through imperial eyes. In Decolonizing methodologies. London: Zed Books: 44-60. Available on Canvas.

Spray, Sharon & Roselle, Laura (2011a) Scholarly Literature and the Literature Review Download Scholarly Literature and the Literature Review. Research and Writing in International Relations (2nd Ed) (pp. 15-31). Boston: Longman.

Spray, Sharon & Roselle, Laura (2011b) Analysis and Writing Download Analysis and Writing. Research and Writing in International Relations (2nd Ed) (pp. 46-66). Boston: Longman.

Svend, Brinkmann (2020). Unstructured and Semistructured Interviewing. In Leavy, Patricia (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research, 424–456. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Swedish Ethical Review Authority (2023). What the Act Says. Available at: https://etikprovningsmyndigheten.se/en/what-the-act-says/ [accessed on 30 August 2023].
Tripp, Aili Mari (2018) Transparency and Integrity in Conducting Field Research on Politics in Challenging Contexts. Perspectives on Politics, 16(3), 728-738.

Vastapuu, Leena (2018). Auto-Photographing (In)Securities: Former Young Female Soldiers’ Post-War Struggles in Monrovia. In Saugman, Rune & Juha A. Vuori (eds.): Visual Security Studies: Sights and Spectacles of Insecurity and War. Routledge, London: 171–187. Available as an ebook.

Viceré, Maria Giulia Amadio (2021). Externalizing EU crisis management: EU orchestration of the OSCE during the Ukrainian conflict. Contemporary Security Policy 42(4): 498-529.

Walldorf Jr, C. William (2022). Narratives and War: Explaining the Length and End of US Military Operations in Afghanistan. International Security 47(1): 93-138.

Weldes, Jutta (2014). High Politics and Low Data. Globalization Discourses in Popular Culture. In Yanow, Dvora & Peregrine Schwartz-Shea (eds.) Interpretation and Method Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe: 228-238. Available as e-book.

Wibben, Annick T.R., ed. (2016). Researching War: Feminist Methods, Ethics and Politics. London: Routledge. Available as e-book.

Wight, Colin (2012). Philosophy of the Social Science and International Relations. In Carlsnaes, Walter, Thomas Risse & Beth A. Simmons (eds.) Handbook of international relations. Thousand Oaks: Sage. 2nd ed. Available on Canvas.